Ethical responsibilities of authors

1. Authors must ensure that their manuscript submitted to Concordia, Journal of Administration and Education is original and has not been published elsewhere.
   • Any material that has been fully published previously or contains significant parts from other works without proper citation will be rejected.
   • A work is considered previously published if it has appeared in full or if significant citations from published materials are included without appropriate referencing.
   • These standards apply to both print and electronic publications, regardless of language.
2. Authors are responsible for preventing any conflicts of interest in the presentation of their data and results.
3. Furthermore, they must correctly cite and reference any segment from others' works or their own previously published writings, including data sources, tables, figures, and documents.
4. It is forbidden for authors to submit their manuscript to another publication while it is under review at this journal. If such behavior is detected, the review or publication process for the manuscript will be suspended.
5. Authors agree to follow the guidelines and editorial processes set forth by Concordia.

Ethical responsibilities of reviewers

1. Reviewers are essential in the editorial process to maintain the quality and relevance of articles considered for publication in the journal. They must evaluate the appropriateness of each article to ensure it aligns with the journal's standards. If an article fails to meet these standards, reviewers are expected to provide well-reasoned explanations for their rejection.
2. Constructive criticism is a vital component of the peer review process, and reviewers are encouraged to offer specific feedback to help authors improve their work. This collaborative method enhances the quality of the articles and supports authors' academic growth by providing valuable insights for improving their submissions.
3. Reviewers should only accept assignments for texts where they have the required expertise, experience, and knowledge. This requirement guarantees a knowledgeable and precise evaluation, supporting the integrity of the peer review process.
4. Additionally, reviewers must avoid conflicts of interest that may arise regarding the texts they are reviewing. This obligation ensures impartiality and objectivity in the evaluation process, maintaining the editorial integrity.

Collectively, these guidelines and principles promote a transparent and ethical peer review process dedicated to continuous improvement, thereby enhancing the journal's credibility and maintaining high academic standards in research.